<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DAILY SHOW: The Atlantic discusses the Betsy McCaughey interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/</link>
	<description>Stephen Colbert and &#039;The Colbert Report&#039; News Blog and Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:15:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344150</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344150</guid>
		<description>YES! Very apt observation ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES! Very apt observation ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wren</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344131</link>
		<dc:creator>wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344131</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s nice. I like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nice. I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344129</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344129</guid>
		<description>As I read on another site:
Colbert has his bump, Stewart has his axe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read on another site:<br />
Colbert has his bump, Stewart has his axe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryLovesColbert</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344127</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryLovesColbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344127</guid>
		<description>Haha! I&#039;d never seen that interview with the Spice Girls - she really didn&#039;t know what was going on! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! I&#8217;d never seen that interview with the Spice Girls &#8211; she really didn&#8217;t know what was going on! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruthPower</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344126</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthPower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344126</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree.  She was not prepared for the interview at all.  She made herself appear very unprofessional as well.  That interview was horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree.  She was not prepared for the interview at all.  She made herself appear very unprofessional as well.  That interview was horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forsakinghalfloves</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344125</link>
		<dc:creator>forsakinghalfloves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344125</guid>
		<description>I hated her finger pointing/waving and her voice. She was so theatrical. She walked out there with a huge binder with no bookmarks or tabs or tape flags or Post-its to find the sections in the bill she claims she has problems with. She was unprepared and desperate and uninformed and stubborn.

I agree, she was condescending. Jezebel calls it the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jezebel.com/5342451/the-daily-show-betsy-mccaughey-provides-dramatic-interpretation-of-health-care-bill&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Palin model for political discourse&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hated her finger pointing/waving and her voice. She was so theatrical. She walked out there with a huge binder with no bookmarks or tabs or tape flags or Post-its to find the sections in the bill she claims she has problems with. She was unprepared and desperate and uninformed and stubborn.</p>
<p>I agree, she was condescending. Jezebel calls it the <a href="http://jezebel.com/5342451/the-daily-show-betsy-mccaughey-provides-dramatic-interpretation-of-health-care-bill" rel="nofollow">Palin model for political discourse</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344124</guid>
		<description>oh gosh, that interview was so weird. I understand what she is trying to do, but it&#039;s totally ludicrous. I did not like when she kept patting at Jon and saying how silly he was, it was terribly obnoxious. I was glad he didn&#039;t really even engage her as much as usual, and he seemed so unhappy to be near her. (who wouldn&#039;t be.) I think the point made in the quote DB chose is so obvious to regular viewers of TDS or TCR you don&#039;t even have to stop and think how to approach the interview, you knew it was going to be a weirdo-person one.

btw, one of the other comments in the online response section mentioned the Spice Girls interview and Posh Spice having a problem with Jon. I just watched that one, and it&#039;s crazy how much she isn&#039;t connecting to anything Jon is doing. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s all that similar to this most recent interview, though, because Victoria Beckham just seemed inexplicably confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh gosh, that interview was so weird. I understand what she is trying to do, but it&#8217;s totally ludicrous. I did not like when she kept patting at Jon and saying how silly he was, it was terribly obnoxious. I was glad he didn&#8217;t really even engage her as much as usual, and he seemed so unhappy to be near her. (who wouldn&#8217;t be.) I think the point made in the quote DB chose is so obvious to regular viewers of TDS or TCR you don&#8217;t even have to stop and think how to approach the interview, you knew it was going to be a weirdo-person one.</p>
<p>btw, one of the other comments in the online response section mentioned the Spice Girls interview and Posh Spice having a problem with Jon. I just watched that one, and it&#8217;s crazy how much she isn&#8217;t connecting to anything Jon is doing. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s all that similar to this most recent interview, though, because Victoria Beckham just seemed inexplicably confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unanimousvote</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344122</link>
		<dc:creator>unanimousvote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344122</guid>
		<description>There is a great deal of forum discussion about this here http://forum.thedailyshow.com/tds/ including a thread about Rachel Madow covering The Daily Show &#039;giving Betsy attention.&#039;

thanks 
U</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great deal of forum discussion about this here <a href="http://forum.thedailyshow.com/tds/" rel="nofollow">http://forum.thedailyshow.com/tds/</a> including a thread about Rachel Madow covering The Daily Show &#8216;giving Betsy attention.&#8217;</p>
<p>thanks<br />
U</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arianne</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344121</link>
		<dc:creator>Arianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344121</guid>
		<description>The only thing I got out of that interview is that the audience that night was awesome (By not acknowledging her when she was attempting to be clever) and that she isn&#039;t clever.
Jon PWN&#039;D her. Big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I got out of that interview is that the audience that night was awesome (By not acknowledging her when she was attempting to be clever) and that she isn&#8217;t clever.<br />
Jon PWN&#8217;D her. Big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrtigger001</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/08/22/daily-show-the-atlantic-discusses-the-betsy-mccaughey-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-344114</link>
		<dc:creator>mrtigger001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=16399#comment-344114</guid>
		<description>hey DB, if you want to post the full interview, the full interview goes like this:

1. Interview (Regular) Part 1
2. Interview (Extended) Part 1
3. Interview (Extended) Part 2

The producers must have uploaded it in a hurry because the labelling is obviously a little abnormal, so it&#039;s not really your fault.

I did feel Betsy was trying to pander &amp; condescend like crazy, which was INCREDIBLY awkward considering that the TDS audience has basically been groomed to be skeptical to that sort of thing. In terms of whether she &quot;disarmed&quot; Jon, it was not so much a disarming as it was basically just not engaging. If you try to engage with Jon on a logical level, 95% of the time you&#039;ll lose or stalemate. The only way you don&#039;t lose is to not engage on a logical level, which is what Betsy did.

What she did is actually not unprecedented; Bill O&#039;Reilly on his last interview on TDS (the &quot;panda bear&quot; one) didn&#039;t engage in a logical conversation and chose to go the name-calling route (&quot;greenwich village opinion&quot;). It&#039;s because he chose not to engage that the discourse went nowhere that night, and that&#039;s what happened tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey DB, if you want to post the full interview, the full interview goes like this:</p>
<p>1. Interview (Regular) Part 1<br />
2. Interview (Extended) Part 1<br />
3. Interview (Extended) Part 2</p>
<p>The producers must have uploaded it in a hurry because the labelling is obviously a little abnormal, so it&#8217;s not really your fault.</p>
<p>I did feel Betsy was trying to pander &amp; condescend like crazy, which was INCREDIBLY awkward considering that the TDS audience has basically been groomed to be skeptical to that sort of thing. In terms of whether she &#8220;disarmed&#8221; Jon, it was not so much a disarming as it was basically just not engaging. If you try to engage with Jon on a logical level, 95% of the time you&#8217;ll lose or stalemate. The only way you don&#8217;t lose is to not engage on a logical level, which is what Betsy did.</p>
<p>What she did is actually not unprecedented; Bill O&#8217;Reilly on his last interview on TDS (the &#8220;panda bear&#8221; one) didn&#8217;t engage in a logical conversation and chose to go the name-calling route (&#8220;greenwich village opinion&#8221;). It&#8217;s because he chose not to engage that the discourse went nowhere that night, and that&#8217;s what happened tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
