<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOM thinks Stephen Colbert&#8217;s parody *supports* them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/</link>
	<description>Stephen Colbert and &#039;The Colbert Report&#039; News Blog and Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:42:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teller</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338747</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338747</guid>
		<description>Seriously. I laughed until I cried. That&#039;s the first time that&#039;s ever happened to me. 

Oh No!!! The homo storm got me. *faints* 

I had to pause the video at this point. I could not breathe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously. I laughed until I cried. That&#8217;s the first time that&#8217;s ever happened to me. </p>
<p>Oh No!!! The homo storm got me. *faints* </p>
<p>I had to pause the video at this point. I could not breathe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jentaps</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338743</link>
		<dc:creator>jentaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338743</guid>
		<description>:-D

(about your Recaptcha)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-D</p>
<p>(about your Recaptcha)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GabbyD</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338742</link>
		<dc:creator>GabbyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338742</guid>
		<description>well, if ur in NOMs shoes, might as well make lemonaide with lemons. if they can use it to make people watch the original AD then, its good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, if ur in NOMs shoes, might as well make lemonaide with lemons. if they can use it to make people watch the original AD then, its good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrtigger001</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338741</link>
		<dc:creator>mrtigger001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338741</guid>
		<description>I dont think they really think that the ad is supporting them. They&#039;re fully aware that they&#039;re being mocked. The true ridiculous notion that they&#039;re subscribing to is the fact that if their ad is being replayed for free on the media, no matter what the context, that constitutes a success for them.

It&#039;s that sort of political campaign conventional wisdom, cynically based on some psychological research, that really gets on my nerves. The theory goes that after a while, people will only remember the ad and not the contextual criticism of it. It only takes a couple logical steps to refute that notion in this case. You&#039;re showing the ad to an audience that&#039;s inherently skeptical of theoconservative ideas. And the immediate parody of the ad is much more memorable than the ad itself. What makes NOM think that they&#039;re changing any minds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think they really think that the ad is supporting them. They&#8217;re fully aware that they&#8217;re being mocked. The true ridiculous notion that they&#8217;re subscribing to is the fact that if their ad is being replayed for free on the media, no matter what the context, that constitutes a success for them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that sort of political campaign conventional wisdom, cynically based on some psychological research, that really gets on my nerves. The theory goes that after a while, people will only remember the ad and not the contextual criticism of it. It only takes a couple logical steps to refute that notion in this case. You&#8217;re showing the ad to an audience that&#8217;s inherently skeptical of theoconservative ideas. And the immediate parody of the ad is much more memorable than the ad itself. What makes NOM think that they&#8217;re changing any minds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaobell</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338740</link>
		<dc:creator>chaobell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338740</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always tickled when conservatives fangirl/boy Stephen, completely oblivious to the fact that he is &lt;i&gt;making fun of them.&lt;/i&gt; :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always tickled when conservatives fangirl/boy Stephen, completely oblivious to the fact that he is <i>making fun of them.</i> :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann G.</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338739</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338739</guid>
		<description>Not everyone on the right is irony challenged or lacking a sense of humor, but for some reason the &quot;clueless doofuses&quot; do seem to gravitate towards each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone on the right is irony challenged or lacking a sense of humor, but for some reason the &#8220;clueless doofuses&#8221; do seem to gravitate towards each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vigwig</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338738</link>
		<dc:creator>vigwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338738</guid>
		<description>Oh-My-God, what a bunch of clueless doofuses.  These people really do live in an alternate universe.

Recaptcha
unhinged 178
!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh-My-God, what a bunch of clueless doofuses.  These people really do live in an alternate universe.</p>
<p>Recaptcha<br />
unhinged 178<br />
!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nukaleu</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338736</link>
		<dc:creator>Nukaleu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338736</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know whether to cuss or laugh at this.  Perhaps both will suffice.

This is positively hilarious.  Keep laughing, NOM...you&#039;ve got a whole new audience rooting against you, and you&#039;re even more clueless than you were before.

&quot;There&#039;s a storm coming...a GIANT...GAY...STORM....&quot;

Yeah...that&#039;s some serious support. *eyeroll*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether to cuss or laugh at this.  Perhaps both will suffice.</p>
<p>This is positively hilarious.  Keep laughing, NOM&#8230;you&#8217;ve got a whole new audience rooting against you, and you&#8217;re even more clueless than you were before.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a storm coming&#8230;a GIANT&#8230;GAY&#8230;STORM&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah&#8230;that&#8217;s some serious support. *eyeroll*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lvtcr</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338735</link>
		<dc:creator>lvtcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338735</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;

Paired with Stephen&#039;s expression and covering PeePop&#039;s eyes--classic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i></p>
<p>Paired with Stephen&#8217;s expression and covering PeePop&#8217;s eyes&#8211;classic!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny with a Y</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2009/04/18/nom-thinks-stephen-colberts-parody-supports-them/comment-page-1/#comment-338734</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny with a Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=12953#comment-338734</guid>
		<description>The GLAAD clip is very funny. I especially liked the dancing at the end.

Although NOM&#039;s letter amuses me, I find that whole organization pathetic. They&#039;ve made it way to easy to mock them. The &quot;Gathering Storm&quot; ad is so bad, it could be a parody of an anti-gay marriage commercial. The first time I saw it, I wondered if it was real or not. And, IMHO if you&#039;re going to use actors, you should pick people who can actually act.

Not only did NOM decide to pick-up the acronym &quot;2M4M&quot; without realizing what it meant, but they also didn&#039;t think to snag the domain name www.2m4m.org before someone else took it and set-up an anti- NOM, pro-gay marriage web site. I was surprised they didn&#039;t take the domain name before they advertised their new acronym. 

Who knows? They may know exactly what they are doing and it&#039;s all part of some elaborate plan that I&#039;m not getting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GLAAD clip is very funny. I especially liked the dancing at the end.</p>
<p>Although NOM&#8217;s letter amuses me, I find that whole organization pathetic. They&#8217;ve made it way to easy to mock them. The &#8220;Gathering Storm&#8221; ad is so bad, it could be a parody of an anti-gay marriage commercial. The first time I saw it, I wondered if it was real or not. And, IMHO if you&#8217;re going to use actors, you should pick people who can actually act.</p>
<p>Not only did NOM decide to pick-up the acronym &#8220;2M4M&#8221; without realizing what it meant, but they also didn&#8217;t think to snag the domain name <a href="http://www.2m4m.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.2m4m.org</a> before someone else took it and set-up an anti- NOM, pro-gay marriage web site. I was surprised they didn&#8217;t take the domain name before they advertised their new acronym. </p>
<p>Who knows? They may know exactly what they are doing and it&#8217;s all part of some elaborate plan that I&#8217;m not getting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
