Jun
24

Episode 4083 (06/23/2008)

By Ms Interpreted on June 24th, 2008 ·

“Guests of The Colbert Report stay at the luxurious ‘crashing with a friend’. This is The Colbert Report!



Equality Time: “Tonight, there is racial progress in South Africa. I hope this means I can start buying blood diamonds again.”

  • Anniversary of Stephen breaking his wrist, WristSTRONG!
  • Racism and South Africa

The WØRD: Black & White

The Audacity of Nope: “Then, Barack Obama rejects public financing. Apparently, he’s not only a secret Muslim, he’s a secret hypocrite.”

  • Tip of the Hat/Wag of the Finger
    • Wag: Obama refusing public financing
    • Tip: Obama refusing public financing
    • Wag: California (gay marriages)
    • Tip: Condoms
    • Wag: High Fuel prices

Class Half Empty: “Plus, my guest Barbara Ehrenreich has a new book called This Land Is Their Land. I assume she means the Chinese.”

  • Guest: Barbara Ehrenreich, Author – This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation

THE COLBERT BUMP – YOU’RE GETTING IT:

This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation


In closing: “Well, that’s it for The Report, everybody. I hope you’ve enjoyed watching me for the past half hour. Now it’s time for me to watch you [stares stonily into the camera]. Good night.”

Video highlight: WristStrong Anniversary – After Stephen’s traumatic wrist injury, he pledged that he would never again break a fall with his hands.

NOTABLE MOMENTS! — Video links and more after the fold

More Video Highlights, courtesy of Comedy Central’s Colbert Report website

NOTABLE MOMENTS

  • As I’m sure you are all aware, this past Saturday, June 21st, was the one year anniversary of an event so shocking that it startled an innocent nation out of its complacency. Yes, one year ago, I, Stephen Colbert, fell and broke my wrist.
  • The upside was, my injury led to my valiant WristSTRONG campaign. It’s mission: to use celebrities to raise awareness of wrist injuries and fight Hollywood’s sick glamorization of wrist violence.
  • Yes, it has been one year since I broke my wrist. Which brings us to the obvious question. What the hell is going on right here? [Camera zooms in on Stephen's eyes and the bridge of his nose, revealing stitches and bruising ... a possible broken nose?] What the hell did I do to myself on Saturday? Got stitches up there, and it looks like I’m growin’ a little map of Norway down one side of my face.
  • Well, folks, after my traumatic wrist injury, I pledged that I would never again break a fall with my hands. That, ahh … that left my face.
  • Now it’s not really important exactly what happened up here. Perhaps I was trying to break the record for smashing watermelons with your head; it is important to ‘thump the melon’ to make sure it’s ripe. Most people just use their fingers.
  • Now, we may never know exactly how this happened, okay? But one thing we do know: it is my responsibility to shed light on Hollywood’s glamorization of face violence. [Montage of clips from Fight Club, Rocky, Airplane!, Chinatown, Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark, Scanners, etc.] Technically, that last one was more than face violence, it was head violence. Shame on you, Hollywood!
  • Nation, I’m going to talk to you about race. I do my part to promote race awareness by pointing to people on the street and shouting, “Black! Indian! Some sorta Asian guy!” Sometimes I even get it right.
  • And while racism is still a problem, we are making progress as a nation. For instance, people now know there are certain words that are offensive when discussing race. Like the word “racist”. [Clip from ABC discussing high and low "racial sensitivity"]
  • If someone admits to being prejudiced at times, they have “low racial sensitivity”. Don’t call them racist! This isn’t 1965, c’mon!
  • Now there is some … inequality still out there. Luckily, someone is making a difference: South Africa. In the past, South Africa has been criticized for its race relations; I never got it, personally. You put a black kid in a white school, you’re fighting segregation; you put one white country on a black continent, and suddenly you’re the bad guy in Lethal Weapon 2.
  • But South Africa has found a way to end one form of inequality, and it’s tonight’s WØRD [Black & White].
  • Folks, last week, South Africa’s high court issued a landmark ruling that classifies Chinese South Africans as “black”. That bears repeating: Chinese are now black. ["I Got 99 Problems but Feng Shui Ain't One."]
  • Now, in some ways, folks, this upsets me. For one, it poses the threat of a black Yo-Yo Ma. The next thing you know, white surburban kids will be listening to cello music. ["Straight Outta Carnegie"]
  • South Africa issued this ruling so Chinese residents who suffered under apartheid would be eligible for the same government programs put in place to help blacks. Now, I think government handouts are wrong [Other Than to Oil Companies], but I do applaud South Africa for lumping ethnic groups together [Racial Turducken].
  • I think we should do the same thing here [E Pluribus Same-um].
  • Because if there still is discrimination here, some of the blame has to go to the fact that there are still so many different groups available to discriminate against. Women, blacks, Latinos, Asians, Muslims, Jews, the poor, immigrants, soccer players, men with girl names like René. It is a smorgasbord! [Dirty Swedes!]
  • I mean, really, who could resist? [The Notoriously Stubborn Irish?]
  • Personally, I am always suspicious of anything that has more than two categories. [Divides Supermarket Into "Cheese" & "Not Cheese"]
  • For instance, you’re either with us or you’re against us. [Or You're Against Us But Have Oil]
  • It is either Coke or Pepsi. You’re either gay or you fight it. [Compromise: Open An Antiques Store]
  • But if we, in America, legally made all those groups black, we could dispel the shadow of discrimination forever by simply electing one black President. I speak, of course, of John McCain. As a senior citizen, he is certainly discriminated against; that would make McCain black. [George Bush's Black Friend]
  • So thank you, South Africa. I have spent so many sleepless nights trying to make McCain seem like anything other than more of the same. [McCain Kept Someone Awake?] But if we follow your example, McCain can be the candidate of change. It is time for a black man to lead the free world, and John McCain is the white man for the job. And that’s The WØRD.
  • Nation, I gotta tell you, I am so tired of wishy-washy weathermen. Partly cloudy? It’s sunny or it isn’t; pick a side. This is Tip of the Hat/Wag of the Finger!
  • Nation, last year, Barack Obama pledged that if he were the Democratic nominee he’d ” … aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
  • Last Thursday, Sen. Obama released this statement ["We've made the decision not to participate in the public financing system for the general election."]
  • That’s a flip-flop, sir! Which is why I’m giving you a wag of my finger … for copying John McCain. Completely reversing course on core issues is Senator McCain’s thing; he did it on President’s tax cuts, courting Christian fundamentalists, immigration and ethanol. Hell, before Obama was even born, John McCain was flip-flopping on the Franco-Prussian War! Are you for Bismarck or against?
  • Now I’m going to flip-flop on flip-flopping and give Senator Obama a tip of my hat, for proving he is a regular politician after all. Just listen to what he said in that exact same announcement. ["Join us in building a new kind of politics."] Senator Obama, this is my favorite kind of new politics: it’s exactly like the old kind of politics. That is change I can believe in! The kind that doesn’t happen.
  • Next, a wag of my finger at California. Last week, California allowed its first gay marriages. But apparently, they didn’t get the message God sent them with that Universal Studio fire.
  • Well, it’s not enough that Californians are attacking straight marriage, now they’re preying on the elderly. Just look at what I found in the THE USA Today: two “[w]omen together for 55 years among first to wed as same-sex marriages legalized“. Shame on you, California, for turning these two sweet old roommates gay!
  • You probably took advantage of the gulliblity of old people and had some smooth-talking gay telemarketer tell them they won a grand prize trip, and the only way to retrieve it was to be gay.
  • California, stop tricking our grandmothers into marrying each other. Or someday, little Billy will open up his birthday card to find a Melissa Etheridge CD.
  • Next, a reservoir tip of my hat to condoms. I was thrilled to learn that, last week, America’s McMurdo research station in Antarctica received “… a year’s supply …” of “… 16,488 condoms ….” That number may seem a bit excessive but, due to Antarctica’s freezing temperatures, you have to wear fifty at a time.
  • And there is a real need for these down there, folks. Research station manager Bill Henricksen put it delicately, saying, ” … for the most part, people who come down here know how to occupy their time ….”
  • Like the old saying, “Everybody looks good after four months of darkness.” Best of all, by wearing condoms, these scientists won’t spawn baby scientists. Although I wouldn’t mind giving a baby a research grant. Maybe he could figure out what happens to the ball when it rolls behind the couch. I am dying to know if it still exists.
  • Finally, a wag of my finger at high fuel prices. Not only are average Americans feeling the crunch, now high fuel prices are causing carnivals to remove gasoline-powered rides from their midways.
  • Folks, a carnival without rides is no carnival at all. It saddens me that our children are going to miss out on the opportunity to ride a fifty year old Tilt-A-Whirl held together with C-clamps, twine, and, let’s say an old hot dog, while this guy’s at the controls.
  • Or that special feeling you get, being told in front of your girlfriend that you’re too short to ride the bumper cars, even though you’re seventeen and maybe haven’t hit your growth spurt yet. C’mon! Bullsh!t!
  • My guest has a new book about the chasm between the rich and the poor. I call it the East River. Please welcome Barbara Ehrenreich!
  • Your new book is called This Land Is Their Land: Reports from a Divided Nation. Why shouldn’t we be a ‘Divided Nation’, ma’am? … What is the division you’re talking about?
    • Ehrenreich: It’s gone much too far. Right now, the top 1%, in terms of wealth, has more wealth than the bottom 90%. Much more.
    • Stephen: Put together?
    • Ehrenreich: Yeah. That 1% outweighing the whole 90% –
    • Stephen: Well that’s a great reason for us to be divided. Because, I mean, unless we’re separated from each other, us rich people are going to feel guilty about how much richer we are, and the poor people are gonna be mad at us for having so much cash. Don’t we need to make it further so we can’t see each other any more?
  • Are you not engaging in class warfare here?
    • Ehrenreich: Yeah, I’m fighting back. Right –
    • Stephen: Against what? You don’t seem to be hurtin’, lady! You’ve got a nice haircut; I’m guessing you don’t sleep in a cardboard box. What are you fighting back against?
  • What’s wrong with a free market system, madame? People can pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. Are you saying that rich people should give poor people bootstraps?
    • Ehrenreich: No, but I think that the rich people should … I mean the super rich. I actually don’t think you qualify.
    • Stephen: I do, actually. I actually do qualify as super rich. Yeah.
    • Ehrenreich: All right, all right, then I’m going to go after you.
    • Stephen: Oh, come on! “Go after” me? See me shake, baby?
  • What’s the solution, here? Do you want to tax the rich? Punish them for making money? … If you’re taxing me at a higher rate than you tax someone who makes less money, then you’re punishing me for being a master of the universe.
    • Ehrenreich: We used to do that in this country: we used to have an income tax system that took 90% of the income of the very, very rich. And you know, that was under a Republican, Dwight Eisenhower –
    • Stephen: Yeah, but he was pretty much a pinko … You know in World War II, when he was in command of our troops? Who was our ally? Russia. Case closed.
  • The book is This Land Is Their Land; my guest is Barbara Ehrenreich. Buy this book so she becomes super rich and has to swallow her words.

Fangirl Suit Report: Black suit, light blue tie with black and silver diagonal stripes. White shirt (with tone on tone white stripes), two-button barrel cuffs. WristSTRONG bracelet.


Related posts

Categories : The Colbert Report

Tags : ·

17 Comments

1

Really loved the interview. I think she put both “Stephen” and Stephen on the spot which was really gutsy! He looked a bit squirmish when she started asking if his security guard was paid more than $12 an hour. Man, who was grilling who?

In the end, though, I think they both enjoyed each other’s company. Interesting fact about the Eisenhower years and 90% being taken from the rich.

P.S. IAASCY promos need to say au revoir!

Reply

truth
June 24th, 2008 at 11:26 am

That part’s tricky since I get the impression that the studio security staff don’t work for Stephen, Comedy Central, or Viacom. Not directly, which is very common. They work for an outside firm. And Ehrenreich did her homework–people working for security contractors during the hours that TCR tapes make perhaps $12-14 an hour.

I winced on behalf of both Stephen and “Stephen” but she was absolutely right to point this out.

Reply

auds
June 24th, 2008 at 1:21 pm

I also think that he just didn’t want to get into personal stuff, stuff about his show. If he wants to talk about any of that, *he* brings it up. He always makes it clear that he’s the interviewer.

Reply

ColbertGirl27
June 24th, 2008 at 1:43 pm

Good point about the security staff not hired directly by TCR. In Stephen’s defense, I have a feeling he gives a great deal to charities and doesn’t “live it up” as much as many celebrities, though I am curious if he is in that top 1%. Haha.

Reply

2

As a side note, I felt this was the first night both shows really poked fun at Obama and it was interesting to see Stewart reassure the audience by saying “It’s ok to laugh at the guy.” Small statement, but struck me as rather significant..or is this just me?

Reply

truth
June 24th, 2008 at 11:27 am

The Fake Newshour demographic is very much the Obama-swooning demographic. I hate that he has to say that, but maybe he really did have to.

Reply

mrtigger001
June 24th, 2008 at 12:44 pm

Yeah, I thought the Obama stuff was great even if you are an Obama fan. Jon probably did have to say it.

TDS’s riff was a lot more biting but Stephen’s was great as well since he also tied it into the bigger picture with John McCain.

Strong episode tonight as well. Hopefully we’re in for a good week.

Reply

3
laughing at nothing
June 24th, 2008 at 3:56 am

CG27, I think you’re right. You always have to be wary of “the Man,” and Obama has earned “the Man” status now.

Also on a sidenote, after watching James McAvoy on TDS I realized that Scottish accents make me swoon. ;)

Reply

truth
June 24th, 2008 at 11:22 am

I missed TDS. James McAvoy is Scottish?!

Oh, boy, gotta watch that when I get home. (swoon)

Reply

VerdureVision
June 24th, 2008 at 2:41 pm

@laughing:

Aye, prepare for double-swoonage then! :-D He’s on The Late Late Show w/ Craig Ferguson on Thurs. 6/26.

Reply

lulubelle
June 24th, 2008 at 3:00 pm

I’m a sucker for a guy with an accent, especially if he’s got a quick wit as well.

Reply

4

I missed TDS. James McAvoy is Scottish?!

Oh, boy, gotta watch that when I get home. (swoon)

Reply

5

Hubby was slightly alarmed when TDS and TCR did Obama jokes last night, but I had to remind him that it doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with political affiliation, it’s just because he happened to be in the news. If something’s in the news, it’s fair game for both shows. It was great to have both the Word and Tip/Hat last night — fantastic interview too!

Reply

6

I was extremely relieved to see both TDS and TCR run segments making fun of Obama last night. The fact that we are nearly a year and a half into the campaign and the shows’ criticism of Obama is still unusual enough for people to comment on shows — to me — just how overwhelmingly positive coverage his coverage has been thus far. He has run a better than average campaign and I will be happy to see him on the ballot come November, but he’s not God, and the near hero worship he’s been afforded throughout most of the primaries and in the time since has really rubbed me the wrong way. The sooner people realize that he is human (however well qualified and exciting he may be as a candidate), the less likely they are to be disappointed when he inevitably does the human thing and errs.

I really enjoyed the show last night; I thought it was very clever and well put together. Covering attitudes toward racism (and other “-isms”) based on the S. Africa story was great. And while Ehrenreich wasn’t the most entertaining guest ever, I thought Stephen did a particularly good job of asking open-ended questions, and he elicited a fair number of substantive responses.

And, of course, I hope that Stephen’s face heals soon. I suspect he may have sustained his injury by engaging in fisticuffs with the likes of these Godless Killing Machines. Feel better, sir!

Reply

auds
June 24th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

I’ve kinda felt that some people tend to give Obama a break because he’s the new guy, and a huge threat to the opposition. The opposition would love to destroy him before he even begins to become established.

I think TDS and TCR have a good sense of this situation, too, and they’ll make as much fun of him as they feel is fair.

Reply

Ms Interpreted
June 24th, 2008 at 1:58 pm

Maybe, but if “some people” all decide to give the same guy a break, I don’t see how that’s fair to any of the other candidates (or to Obama, frankly, because the “new car smell” will wear off eventually). I’m not saying that everyone needs to be attacked the same amount, and particularly not if the attacks are gratuitous, but I do think that Obama has enjoyed much more favorable coverage overall than other candidates have; consider all the Democratic candidates, like Edwards, that never even made it out of the gate. And criticism of Obama (with the exception of the “secret Muslim” and Rev. Wright stories that anyone who was half way paying attention knew were B.S.) has been pretty tame: “He’s so young/inexperienced!” or “Women are swooning!” or “He doesn’t wear a flag pin!”

As I said, I think he’s run a better than average campaign, so there has been less to criticize him for, in general, which is to his credit. But it was hugely satisfying for me to see that Jon and Stephen weren’t about to let him slide last night.

I was reading one of Glenn Greenwald’s posts on the bipartisan “compromise” (read: FISA travesty and shameful decision to give telecoms immunity) the other day (I LOVE Greenwald, btw), and he quoted one of his commenters on the extremes that seem to characterize so many of people’s attitudes toward Obama:

Why are so many four-year-olds and fourteen-year-olds making comments on blogs?

Four-year-olds see their preferred politicians as god-like fathers (or mothers) whose virtuous character will guarantee good judgment. If a judgment looks questionable to you, then it’s because you don’t know all the facts that mommy and daddy know, or it’s because you aren’t as wise as them.

Fourteen-year-olds have had their illusions shattered about those devilish politicians so now they perceive the TRUTH – - that mommy and daddy make bad judgments because mommy and daddy are utterly corrupt.

That, to me, is what I’ve found most alarming about so many of the Democrats who are (or were) Obama’s hard-core supporters: they see things in (WØRD) “Black & White”. “Obama is ideal” or “Obama is part of the corrupt system”, there’s no in between. By all means, get excited about our candidate, but a healthy democracy thrives on criticism, and Obama shouldn’t be exempt from it just because we’re afraid of McCain.

That’s really the point I was trying to make.

Reply

ColbertGirl27
June 24th, 2008 at 1:47 pm

That pic is too cute! I’d make it my wallpaper except that I always have to have Stephen on my wallpaper:)

Reply

Leave a Comment

© 2010 No Fact Zone All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright