Variety looks at four of this year’s Peabody honorees, including The Colbert Report, and how their networks reeled in the audiences.
How to hook highbrow audiences
Peabody honorees used smart marketing tactics
By SUSAN YOUNG. . .
[I]ntelligent TV can sometimes be the hardest to market, relying more on critics and creative positioning.
From “Mad Men” to fellow Peabody honorees “30 Rock,” “The Colbert Report” and “Dexter” (four of 35 programs honored by the panel this year), each of these winners offers a strong case study in how to attract auds to highbrow fare.
. . .
Truthiness in advertising
Comedy Central scored an unexpected boost promoting Stephen Colbert’s “The Daily Show” spinoff when C-SPAN aired the comedian’s April 2006 speech at the White House Correspondents’ Assn. dinner. But it was the attention his remarks generated on video-sharing outlets like YouTube that drove the net’s campaign.
“That clip got millions of hits and made Stephen a hot property,” says Peter Risafi, a senior brand marketing exec for Comedy Central. “With this, we moved into digital marketing for the show so we could leverage those clips that were going viral.”
Risafi’s team began posting broadcast clips, pushing search engine marketing and moving into social networking sites. To grab a politically savvy audience, they allowed clips to go out on such media-oriented blogs as Huffington Post and Gawker.
“If you want to appeal to younger, more educated audiences, you need to understand that the world is changing and that the more sites you are on, the better it is for your show,” Risafi says. “Every night, Stephen has a dialogue with college-age people between 18-34, and their world is a digital world.”
. . .
It’s interesting to note that this article specifically cites YouTube and the viral success of The Colbert Report‘s clips as influencing Comedy Central’s decision to engage in widespread digital marketing. Of course, it never hurts to have someone like Stephen at the helm of a web-savvy team of show staffers; if you can’t succeed in the digital marketing of a man who’s just won “Webby Person of the Year”, it’s time to throw in the towel.
That’s an interesting take on things. I definitely enjoy the interactive aspect of Colbert. I have never really liked the WHCD address much, even though I think it’s required viewing for anyone seeking membership in the Colbert Nation.
I think the subject matter of TCR, the stuff that Colbert and crew actually choose to go after, that’s what distinguishes the show as something worth watching.
oh yeah, I suppose it went without saying that I’m a highbrow viewer. :)
Shout Out (Hey!):
0
I think that quote from Petr Rifasi is a little bit of revisionist history, because it seems to me that the time right after the WHCD was time of the great youtube purge, when CC went after everyone was posting TCR-TDS clips online. So they were actually trying to clamp down on the viral impact of the show when it could have been greatest, IMO.
Shout Out (Hey!):
0
My memory is a little fuzzy (I am over 40, it’s to be expected…), but I think the great YouTube purge came later than that. When I first discovered TCR in the fall of 2006, about 6 months after the WHCD, there were still plenty of TCR and SWC clips on YouTube. I think Viacom started to bring the hammer down sometime early in ’07.
“Every night, Stephen has a dialogue with college-age people between 18-34 [...]“
I’m sorry, what? (I had no idea college lasted so long these days…)
Shout Out (Hey!):
0
Hahaha! I had no idea I was still in college. Sweet! Beer pong anyone?
Shout Out (Hey!):
0
They’re referring to professional students:)
Shout Out (Hey!):
0