Wikidrama redux? South Africa tries to control its elephant population
ByWay back in 2006, Stephen Colbert started a feud with a little website known as Wikipedia and dared us, the fledgling Colbert Nation, to reverse the course of extinction of the African elephant by editing the relevant Wikipedia pages. Colbert University has the history, and you can watch the Wørd segment that started wikiality fever here:
Watch Stephen’s continued reporting on actual elephant populations (and vasectomies) here:
Now, a year and a half later, South Africa has announced that it will lift the ban on killing elephants because the population has nearly tripled in size since the ban went into effect.
South Africa to sanction killing of elephants
PRETORIA, South Africa (AP)South Africa announced Monday that it was reversing a 1995 ban on killing elephants to help control their booming population, drawing instant outrage from animal-rights activists.
Environment Minister Marthinus van Schalkwyk did not say how many elephants could be killed, saying only that some animal-rights groups’ estimates of 2,000 to 10,000 were “hugely inflated.”
“Culling will only be allowed as a last option and under very strict conditions,” van Schalkwyk told reporters. “Our simple reality is that elephant population density has risen so much in some southern African countries that there is concern about impacts on the landscape, the viability of other species and the livelihoods and safety of people living within elephant ranges.”
The Johannesburg-based group Animal Rights Africa threatened to call for international tourist boycotts and protests and to take legal action.
South Africa’s elephant population has ballooned to more than 20,000 from 8,000 in 1995, when international pressure led to a ban on killing them.
This is a controversial and emotional issue. The South African national park service says that if elephants had not been killed between 1967 and 1994, their population would be about 80,000 strong right now. But culling elephants from their tribes will be difficult due to their social nature and strong family groups, and animal rights activists are understandably outraged.
So as not to start a heated animal rights discussion, let’s leave it at this: Stephen was talking about tripling the elephant population in 2006. Today, South Africa has more elephants than it can handle. Just how great is the power of wikiality?
Related posts





12 Comments
February 25th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
:D OMG, that’s freaking awesome, lol! I mean, not that they’re gonna let people kill elephants, lol, but awesome that Stephen’s statement is now true, lol!
Reply
February 25th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
Between this and the Da-Colbert Code, this can only mean one thing: God is on Stephen Colbert’s side. And by the transitive property of Huckabee, God is with the Colbert Nation.
We did it! :)
Reply
February 25th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
@zonkbert:
I thought it meant that TCR was an aphrodisiac for elephants… ;)
Reply
February 25th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
If we let truthiness be our guide, the actual facts behind why the elephant population is growing don’t really matter. What matters is that our guts tell us that Stephen and his loyal mob of followers decided what was reality so it happened. :-)
Way to go Nation. WE DID IT! Jimmy, where are the balloons? We need some red, white and blue balloons to drop from the ceiling.
Reply
February 25th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
No. Way.
Reply
February 25th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
I smell balloons dropping on Tuesday. The Nation said it and it became truth.
Reply
February 25th, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Will this lower the price of ivory or what? Make it semi-legitimate or something?
I’m reminded of the seal bashing in Futurama. Man, it’s really hard when man has to play God and chose between elephants and the REST of Africa..
Reply
February 26th, 2008 at 1:05 am
sounds like the elephants got the good ol’ colbert bump.
Reply
February 26th, 2008 at 6:46 am
It’s a shame that man is too arrogant to let nature take her course.
@TehBuLL – I laughed way to much at that.
Reply
February 26th, 2008 at 7:39 am
Time for an ‘I DID IT’ segment!
Reply
February 28th, 2008 at 1:42 am
Saying that ‘Africa has more elephants than it can handle’ is like saying ‘Hitler had more Jews than he could handle’. One planet – everyone who’s alive right now has (according to most STATED human ethical systems) a right to their life and an intrinsic value for their own right. The possibility of land developers needing the land elephants are currently covering (not living on but using to connect their ‘islands’ of living space) to make money hasn’t occured to you? It should. I’m a South African and we see both people and animals booted off land that is ‘marketable’ every day. Just presenting the bigger picture, guys.
Reply
February 28th, 2008 at 11:55 am
@aNGELA: That could have been phrased a little more eloquently, but the point of the post was not to say whether booting animals or people off any land is right or wrong. The bigger picture is not the point here – I was highlighting the joke of Stephen’s apparent influence over the population of African elephants through Wikipedia. Regarding your reference to Hitler, which I personally believe is not appropriate for this blog unless it’s followed immediately by “-loving queers,” I can only refer you to Godwin’s Law.
Reply