Strike update: The Jay Leno monologue controversy gets crazier
ByI don’t mean to keep harping on this, but the question of just what is and is not acceptable for the returning hosts under the strike rules is pretty important at present, and it sounds like even the people who should be “experts” in this area can’t seem to agree on what’s allowed. I love that the AP article I posted earlier (see my update below) simply said, in a truly comical understatement, “the guild’s contract ‘is notoriously difficult to interpret.’”
No kidding.
Have you seen Deadline Hollywood Daily lately? (And if not, what is it going to take for me to get you to start reading it regularly?!) In the last couple of hours, there have been updates and clarifications galore.
Here’s what the current story is: Leno claims that he believed he was within his rights to write his own monologue because of the exception in the WGA’s “Minimum Basic Agreement” that permits a performer to write the lines that he will be delivering on air, himself (that’s the exception I mentioned in this post). However, according to the current story from Nikki Finke, this exception doesn’t apply if the person in question is also billed as a writer on his own show, as Jay is. [Note: Stephen and Jon are credited writers on their respective shows, too.] Adding to the tension, NBC continues to insist that Jay can legally do his monologue. The guild leadership, for its part, seems reluctant to take concrete disciplinary action against such a high-profile member.
Now for the really crazy part: Jay evidently met with WGA-West President Patric Verrone on Monday and told him that he (Jay) would be doing the monologue, to which Verrone reportedly replied that he’d look the other way. Now, however, Verrone is saying that Jay’s monologue is in violation, and Jay is, well, let’s say ‘unhappy’ about the conflicting messages.
Some excerpts from Deadline Hollywood Daily (but you should really read her stories here and here, or click on the post titles):
NBC: Leno Can Write His Monologue; WGA: He Can’t But We Don’t Want War
NBC has just issued the following statement. “The WGA agreement permits Jay Leno to write his own monologue for The Tonight Show. The WGA is not permitted to implement rules that conflict with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement between the studios and the WGA.” …
EXCLUSIVE: It sure seems like Jay Leno will now be free to perform his nightly Tonight Show monologue. That’s because I’ve learned that the Writers Guild Of America has decided quietly not to go to war with its prominent member. “We are not interested in a battle here between Jay and the Guild,” a WGA insider just told me … Now get this: I’m told Leno can “ad-lib” his monologue. He just can’t “write” his monologue. Huh?
And,
… [O]n Monday at WGA headquarters, Jay Leno set up a meeting with WGA West president Patric Verrone and The Tonight Show writers and some other WGA members and informed them he was going to write and perform his own monologue when he went back on the air Wednesday. “Patric Verrone said, ‘We’re going to look the other way.’ And there were a lot of witnesses in that room,” the spokesperson just told me. “So if Patric Verrone now disputes that he told Jay he could do the monologue, why weren’t there further actions by the WGA between Monday and Wednesday?”
. . .
Now I hear NBC is consulting with its lawyers to figure this all out. But I’m told that the network and Leno are both pissed at what they see as the WGA’s talking-out-of-both-sides-of-its-mouth behavior here. “Especially considering that no one has been more supportive of the striking writers than Jay,” the NBC spokesperson told me.
As Nikki rightly points out, if Jay is allowed to continue doing his monologue, the person who should be most peeved about it is Dave Letterman, who played by the rules every step of the way but who will see his advantage erode if the guild winks at Jay’s writing. If indeed the the monologue is verboten, then knowing that Jay gets to keep delivering it has got to be a bitter pill for Dave to swallow.
EDITED TO ADD: While I was working on this post, The New York Times posted a pretty comprehensive article about this story, too. This article makes it sound like the question about whether the “Minimum Basic Agreement” exception applies to the hosts isn’t actually clear; the WGA says the exception doesn’t apply, but it sounds like other lawyers may still be fighting over that issue.
FURTHER EDITED TO ADD: The latest from Deadline Hollywood Daily gives the WGA’s story about what happened at the secret meeting on Monday. An interesting bit:
[H]ere’s what I can’t understand. Leno tells the WGA he’s going to do his monologue. And that doesn’t ring a bell for the guild members to ask him HOW he’s doing that monologue?
“In retrospect, it should have been clarified right then and there,” the WGA spokesperson admitted to me. “But the exchange came at the end of a long and difficult meeting and we were wrapping it up and it was one of the last exchanges in the meeting.”
It’s clear that, on Monday, the guild did not repeat the warning about “no monologues” which it had issued the day NBC announced that Leno and Conan O’Brien were going back on air. (See my previous, WGA Reminds Returning Jay And Conan: No Monologues.) But it’s also a he said/he said situation whether or not the guild actually gave Leno a pass on writing his monologue …
The Associated Press has also updated its story on the WGA-NBC fracas, complete with dueling statements from their attorneys:
“The WGA agreement permits Jay Leno to write his own monologue for `The Tonight Show,’” NBC said in a statement Thursday. “The WGA is not permitted to implement rules that conflict with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement between the studios and the WGA.”
The agreement between the guild and producers expired Oct. 31 but its terms remain in effect, said Andrea Hartman, executive vice president and deputy general counsel for NBC Universal. She cited federal labor law.
According to the contract, “material written by the person who delivers it on the air” is exempted from the agreement. The exception applies to shows outside prime-time, which includes NBC’s “Tonight Show.”
Leno did not mention the dispute during Thursday’s show, which he opened with another monologue.
For its part, the union argues that it’s on firm ground in the context of either its “strike rules” or the expired contract.
“Our position is that our strike rules don’t conflict here and, because he’s (Leno) always been employed as a writer” on the show, the contract exception doesn’t apply to him, said guild spokesman Neal Sacharow.
Ugh. This has got to be tying the other hosts’ stomachs in nervous knots. Why can’t the AMPTP just give the writers what they want and deserve? I’m just sick about this.
FURTHER EDITED: The WGA is now saying that it will pursue Jay for breaking strike rules. See this post.
Related posts





19 Comments
January 3rd, 2008 at 9:08 pm
@ *
Well, that small hope that I had with the ‘Minimum Basic Agreement’ is squashed.
Reply
January 3rd, 2008 at 9:36 pm
And Jay’s doing a monologue again.
Reply
January 3rd, 2008 at 9:37 pm
…and Verrone has changed his story…
Reply
January 3rd, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Oh dear God…this is horrible. It’s almost like two kids fighting in the back seat of the car, yelling, “No you didn’t!”, “Yes I did!”, “No you didn’t!”, “Yes I did!”
I think I’d be ticked off too if I were Dave. But, if this hurts Jay’s reputation, Dave might benefit in the end.
@ Ms. I,
I think a lot of us strike junkies read Nikki’s Blog pretty regularly — and, I think we all really appreciate your snippets of some of her longer posts. So, keep it up…though, I think I’m starting to understand your strike fatigue…hang in there. You’re doing a great job!
Reply
January 3rd, 2008 at 11:15 pm
I can’t keep up with all this news. My head is spinning right now. Anyone else?
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 12:53 am
Gah, this is all so confusing. I’m so anxious to see what Stephen’s going to do on Monday, and whether or not he’ll be in character.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 5:13 am
This is alot to take in! I hope Stephen and Jon don’t get mixed up in this kind of controversy aswell…:-S Monday should be interesting!
Thanks for all the updates by the way :-) As I don’t live in the US I don’t see alot of coverage on the strike, so its nice to know whats going on!
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 6:41 am
Ms Interpreted: Why can’t the AMPTP just give the writers what they want and deserve? I’m just sick about this.
Exactly. And thanks for bringing us back to the main point. Does anyone notice that you see the initials WGA a lot more than you see the initials AMPTP–in every article, press release, and blog?
The Guild is bringing a lot of negative attention to themselves with their incomprehensible restrictions and rules that nobody, including the Guild seems to be able to interpret, let alone enforce. The childish internal bickering is giving the AMPTP/media moguls just what they want: it takes the heat and spotlight off them and makes the Guild look weak.
They are shooting themselves in the foot and weakening their cause with all the infighting. It’s too bad.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 7:25 am
To me this seems like a misunderstanding that shouldn’t amount to a war.
Jay’s show will be on whether he does a monologue or not, and thus his staff will be employed whether he does a monologue or not. If he supports the WGA, he should say “my bad” and stop doing it. If he doesn’t, he shouldn’t be a member. Why isn’t it that simple?
If he continues to do the monologue and the WGA does nothing… that’s really going to hurt them.
The bit about “no one being more supportive of the writers than Jay” from an NBC spokesperson made me laugh, though. Who better to gauge WGA support, right? ;)
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 7:39 am
If the WGA is smart, they’ll leave Leno alone even if he is technically breaking the rules. They have two choices. They can keep Leno happy and he can be an effective mouthpiece, because he’s popular and has a pulpit, or they can be perceived as the bullies picking on Leno over arcane rules (the average person on the street is going to think it’s stupid that Leno can’t write his own monologues) and it will detract from the overall purpose of the strike and they’ll lose public support.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 7:42 am
The WGA needs to stay on message. The message is “our talented hardworking writers are merely asking for their fair share of what’s due them when their work is put on the Internet.” If the message becomes “we’re mad at Jay Leno because he wrote his own monologue,” it’s all over in the court of public opinion.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 8:03 am
I see what you’re saying, but it’s hard to stay on message if it looks like you’re lacking solidarity. Jay doing his monologue and the WGA looking the other way basically says that their rules are arbitrary, and I can’t blame any writers who feel like the WGA is playing favorites. I mean, how can the WGA look like a serious organization when the public sees them going, “Well, these are the rules, but I guess not really for you, since you’re popular and all.”
At this point I think more attention needs to be brought to the empty negotiating table. It feels like now all the attention is just on what the writers are doing as opposed to what the AMPTP is not doing.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 8:23 am
“At this point I think more attention needs to be brought to the empty negotiating table. It feels like now all the attention is just on what the writers are doing as opposed to what the AMPTP is not doing.”
That is exactly the point that I was trying to make.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 8:25 am
Ratings are way down and the hosts have to return to make their shows relevant again. I don’t know why hosts can’t write their own material. They at least should have an opportunity to retain the integrity of their programming while the strike continues.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 8:57 am
@pinhead: Yeah, I was basically concurring that as important or unimportant Leno might be, there are bigger issues to be dealt with.
@gina: That would defeat the point of the strike. The writers are an important part of maintaining the integrity of a show, and thus they should be fairly compensated for their work.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 9:34 am
We haven’t heard from the AMPTP because they do not care. I wish the late shows hadn’t gone back on air. I just can’t believe how over this whole thing is.
I wish Colbert and Stewart weren’t in this situation, but since they are, I hope they spend all of their time on air reading from great works of literature.
Stewart should read from the Communist Manifesto. Colbert should read “Bartleby the Scrivener.”
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 9:49 am
Gaia, my concern is that John Q. Public isn’t going to care enough about the rules of the strike to know that Leno’s not “supposed” to write his monologue. John Q. Public knows the writers are on strike and thinks their demands are probably pretty reasonable, and wants it all resolved so he can watch Leno again. JQP now sees Leno back on the air and is glad. JQP is going to react badly to hearing Leno dissed, and then the focus will be on the writers and their dissing / blackballing / “disciplining” of Leno over a technicality that is irrelevant to JQP, as opposed to the AMPTP and how they haven’t stepped up to the plate to negotiate. Sometimes you have to lose a battle to win the war. I think this is one of these times.
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 10:02 am
All of this really makes my head spin and continues to just make me sad.
I was reading some of the comments over at Nikki’s site about all this, and one of the commenters linked to this LA Times Op-Ed piece. I think it does a really nice job of putting things in perspective, which I think is something everyone may be losing site of.
I’m starting to feel, now, that the big companies are trying to use our beloved late-night hosts as pawns and distractions in their greedy game, leaving the public to focus only on the details of a few, forgetting what the real problem is here: That the AMPTP left the bargaining table and is refusing to negotiate at all. Getting all ticked off at each other is something I think they’re counting on to break the will of the WGA, and, as they say, “United we stand, divided we fall.”
Reply
January 4th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Chicago- In the end, yeah, I agree that the public isn’t that invested and so the focus should be shifted away from Leno. But I still don’t think it’s good for union morale to completely ignore it.
Reply