<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stephen Colbert featured in Canada&#8217;s Maclean&#8217;s magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nofactzone.net/2007/10/13/stephen-colbert-featured-in-canadas-macleans-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2007/10/13/stephen-colbert-featured-in-canadas-macleans-magazine/</link>
	<description>Stephen Colbert and &#039;The Colbert Report&#039; News Blog and Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:03:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheLakeEffect</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2007/10/13/stephen-colbert-featured-in-canadas-macleans-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-191624</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLakeEffect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=2387#comment-191624</guid>
		<description>Rest assured, I SEE the everyday satire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rest assured, I SEE the everyday satire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxy</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2007/10/13/stephen-colbert-featured-in-canadas-macleans-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-173941</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=2387#comment-173941</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with the article, the point of formula 401 for instance is to make fun of O&#039;Rielly for being such a sellout with all his merch.  I don&#039;t think it was a random sitcom thing to be silly.  I&#039;m always impressed with the amount of planing that goes into the bits.  But I can see since the paper&#039;s from Canada, they may not see the everyday satire.  I know I wouldn&#039;t get stuff like that about Canadian politics and journalism since I&#039;m in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with the article, the point of formula 401 for instance is to make fun of O&#8217;Rielly for being such a sellout with all his merch.  I don&#8217;t think it was a random sitcom thing to be silly.  I&#8217;m always impressed with the amount of planing that goes into the bits.  But I can see since the paper&#8217;s from Canada, they may not see the everyday satire.  I know I wouldn&#8217;t get stuff like that about Canadian politics and journalism since I&#8217;m in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shruti</title>
		<link>http://www.nofactzone.net/2007/10/13/stephen-colbert-featured-in-canadas-macleans-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-173700</link>
		<dc:creator>Shruti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=2387#comment-173700</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that&#039;s a strange argument to make.

I don&#039;t think that building story lines or creating a character necessarily automatically make something sitcomish.

But I mean, I think it is true that as the show has progressed we&#039;ve seen a lot more random character stuff than hard satire.

&quot;If mayors, senators and journalists ever stop participating, The Colbert Report might have to downplay the story elements and go back to pure satire.&quot;

No, that&#039;s not true. His character could pick up on anything small and turn it into a huge deal - it&#039;s not just politicians and journalists that create the story element of the show; in fact, I&#039;d say it&#039;s the opposite and that they foster the satirical element.

Anyway, thanks for posting this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#8217;s a strange argument to make.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that building story lines or creating a character necessarily automatically make something sitcomish.</p>
<p>But I mean, I think it is true that as the show has progressed we&#8217;ve seen a lot more random character stuff than hard satire.</p>
<p>&#8220;If mayors, senators and journalists ever stop participating, The Colbert Report might have to downplay the story elements and go back to pure satire.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, that&#8217;s not true. His character could pick up on anything small and turn it into a huge deal &#8211; it&#8217;s not just politicians and journalists that create the story element of the show; in fact, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s the opposite and that they foster the satirical element.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for posting this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
