Wikiality is the new reality: Wikipedia founder admits that Wikipedia is not objective
ByAs fans of The Colbert Report know, Stephen’s feud with Wikipedia has been simmering ever since he introduced the concept of “Wikiality” (reality, or truth, based on popular consensus) back on July 31st, 2006. He was subsequently blamed as a “vandal” by many proponents of Wikipedia when nearly all entries referencing elephants were changed to reflect Stephen’s suggestion that the elephant population had tripled in the last ten years. On the January 29th, 2007 episode, Stephen’s WØRD was “Wikilobbying,” a reference to the mini-controversy surrounding Microsoft’s plan to pay for Wikipedia edits. Stephen used the opportunity to announce that “Reality has become a commodity” and, for a few moments, Wikipedia’s own “Reality” entry supported his statement. That entry, and many others, have been protected (at least temporarily) to prevent further Colbert-inspired tampering.
Given this history, I was amused to see this article about Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales in the BBC News. Although the feud between The Colbert Report and Wikipedia is not the focus of the article, these sections caught my eye:
Wikipedia’s idealism, that some would argue is essentially flawed in that verifiability and not “objective” truthfulness is the standard by which entries are judged, has been heavily lampooned on American television in the last few months, by the satirist Stephen Colbert.
In his persona as a polemical and bombastic news anchorman, Colbert lampooned the idea of allowing enthusiasts to form a consensus amongst themselves on what is fact, or not, coining the word “Wikiality”.
It has become a running joke, and the site’s administrators have intervened to stop some of the show’s fans from altering entries.
Unphased [sic]
Wales himself is unfazed by how easy it is for unregistered readers to make instant changes on Wikipedia – sometimes for the good, but often out of mischief. Constant upheaval and occasional “vandalism” of the site, is a price worth paying, he believes.
. . .
Ultimately however, some wonder whether the collectivist world of Wiki, might not become more and more untrustworthy and cultish as the web expands. It is a danger that Wales himself seems to be aware of.
Speaking at the University of Pennsylvania in June last year, he reportedly said that Wikipedia should not be used by college students to conduct serious research, and if students continue to believe in the objectivity of Wikipedia, they only have themselves to blame. [Emphasis added]
Sounds to me like Jimmy Wales just admitted to the truthiness of Wikiality.
Editor’s Note (by DB):
Speaking of “Wikiality”, do we have any proof that Stephen Colbert is hosting the Grammy awards other than the Wikipedia entry (which, btw, has been modified to no longer include this information) yet? No? Yeah, that’s what I thought.
Related posts





4 Comments
February 7th, 2007 at 4:18 pm
[...] Surgiu o neologismo “Wikiality”: a realidade subjectiva baseada em consenso popular induzida ou controlada pelos administradores da Wikipedia (ver exemplo). Technorati Tags: política, politicamente correcto, Wikiality, wikipédia, wikipedia, Wikipedia Industry [...]
February 7th, 2007 at 10:50 pm
Of course it’s not objective. I have to hear an earful from the Anti-Colbert clique anytime anything resembling “Colbertcruft” pops up. All it takes is one humourless administrator to give such an article a thumbs down (as was done with Recurring Elements of Colbert Report and Stephen Colbert Day), which sometimes makes discussions pointless when the majority of respondants bring up some interesting points for inclusion.
BTW, for those of you missing the recurring elements page, I’ve found it hiding here – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tree_Biting_Conspiracy/The_Colbert_Report_recurring_elements
Reply
February 7th, 2007 at 11:55 pm
The wikipedia page “Grammy awards of 2007″ still has this as their first line:
‘The 49th Annual Grammy Awards will honor the best in music of the recording year of 2006. They will be hosted by Stephen Colbert.’
and this is showing up in blogs and even in a press release listing major entertainment industry events.
But no, I haven’t found anything to verify it yet… except those that use Wikipedia as a source. WikiJustice.com or IntegrityWiki.com?
Reply
March 8th, 2007 at 10:20 pm
Jimmy Wales has actually emailed me personally telling me he was excited about my site.
Reply